February 24, 2026 minutes

THE STATE OF UTAH
COUNTY OF SEVIER
CITY OF RICHFIELD

At the City Council
In and For Said City
February 24, 2026

Minutes of the Richfield City Council meeting held on Tuesday, February 24, 2026, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Richfield City office building located at 75 East Center, Richfield, Utah. Mayor Bryan L. Burrows presiding.

  1. OPENING REMARKS
  2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
  3. ROLL CALL
  4. NEWELL HALES
  5. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
  6. YOUTH CITY COUNCIL REPORT
  7. UTAH HOUSING CORPORATION IMPACT FEES
  8. STORAGE CONTAINER PUBLIC HEARING
  9. “R” PROJECT
  10. WINKEL ANNEXATION
  11. PIONEER TOWNHOMES DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
  12. CAPITAL PROJECTS LIST
  13. OTHER BUSINESS
  14. ADJOURN
  15. OPENING REMARKS were offered by Rob Jenson.
  16. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Mayor Bryan Burrows.
  17. ROLL CALL. Present: Bryan Burrows (Not voting), Brayden Gardner, Kip Hansen, Kendrick Thomas, Michele Jolley (Not voting), Rob Jenson (Not voting), New member, Andrew Chappell, Kevin Arrington.
    Also in attendance, Travis Kyhl, Tracy Balch, Russ Brightwell, Elizabeth Steele, Edward Nielson, Kianna Byers, Newell Hales, Tammy Hales, Jacoy Robinson, Chelsea Penney, Ben Robinson, Micklane Farmer, Michelle Olsen, Sean Lloyd, Jaron Thomas, Keith Mogan and David Anderson.
  18. NEWELL HALES. Mr. Hales introduced himself to the Council and noted that he is currently running for County Commission. He explained his family’s history in the area as well as his platform. He also discussed the various community groups and boards he has served on, as well as the projects he helped make a reality. He said he would like to see Sevier County’s economy and tax base increase so local youth have a place to live and work.
  19. Conflict of interest. No conflicts of interest were noted
  20. Youth City Council Report – Kianna Byers, Richfield Youth City Council Mayor, reported on a cemetery service project the YCC has been working on. She said they spent eight and a half hours marking every veteran in the cemetery and counted 739 veterans.
    They plan to have a booth at the cemetery on Memorial Day. The booth will have a list of veterans so people can confirm their loved ones are included. They identified 49 veterans from Vietnam, 153 from Korea, 361 from World War II, 56 from World War I, nine from the Spanish-American War, five from the Civil War, 14 from the American Indian War, and one from the Mormon Battalion.
    The hope is that this list will help with future service projects by the YCC, as well as any future projects involving veterans in the cemetery that the City may undertake. The YCC would like to place a flag on every veteran’s grave for Memorial Day. They are also working with Wreaths Across America.
    The information is currently maintained in a Google Sheet that will be provided to the City. Each veteran is also mapped to their burial plot location.
    Councilmember Chappell said this is a great resource and should be preserved by the City.
  21. Review and discuss waiving the impact fees for the Utah Housing Corporation. Travis Kyhl stated that he is with R6 and that they partner with the Utah Housing Corporation. He explained that the project would be part of the existing townhome development and would be completed under the CrOwn program (Credit to Own). The homes are rented for 15 years and then must be sold. They are maintained at an affordable rent during the rental period and then sold below market value.
    This would involve four townhomes matching those currently in the development.
    Mayor Burrows asked whether the units would be included in the existing HOA. He also noted that the City has not previously waived impact fees.
    Mr. Kyhl stated the units would be integrated into the existing HOA. He acknowledged that an impact fee waiver may be a broader policy discussion than what is currently on the agenda.
    Councilmember Hansen asked whether the Utah Housing Corporation is a public or private entity. Mr. Kyhl explained that it serves as the state’s housing authority, placing it under the public umbrella. He said that waiving fees would not benefit the developer; any waiver would reduce rent and the eventual purchase price.
    Councilmember Arrington noted the challenge of distinguishing between low-income and affordable housing.
    Mr. Kyhl stated that the units would be set aside for individuals earning 60 percent of the area median income. The goal is to help tenants prepare for homeownership during the rental phase. He noted they expect to go out to bid within 90 days and are aware of settling issues, with a soil’s analysis planned to address them.
    Councilmember Thomas asked whether other cities offer this type of waiver. Mr. Kyhl responded that several do for low-income or affordable housing projects.
    Councilmember Arrington stated that waiving fees ultimately shifts the burden to general taxpayers.
    City Administrator Jolley explained the total impact fees that would apply to the project.
    Mayor Burrows stated that the State Legislature is considering legislation that could affect how water projects are funded, potentially requiring communities to contribute to a statewide fund rather than receiving direct project funding.
    Councilmember Gardner expressed interest in exploring impact fee exemptions or discounts for single-family homes.
    Councilmember Arrington suggested the City consider policy changes that incentivize development without negatively affecting taxpayers.
    Mayor Burrows stated that each home requires nine-tenths (9/10) of an acre-foot of water. The City’s impact fees were originally set at approximately $10,000 per acre-foot, but current costs are closer to $30,000 per acre-foot. The City can only recoup the amount established in its impact fee schedule.
  22. Public Hearing to receive comments on portable storage containers – Review and discuss amending section 17.14.300 and 17.30.020 of the Richfield City Code. Mayor Burrows opened the public hearing at 7:25 p.m.
    Deputy Clerk Anderson explained the proposed ordinance to amend Sections 17.14.300 and 17.30.020 of the Richfield City Code. Currently, cargo containers are not permitted as permanent storage fixtures in downtown or residential zones. The amendment would extend the prohibition to all property along Main Street from the North I-70 Interchange to 1500 South.
    Councilmember Arrington asked whether any existing containers would be affected. Deputy Clerk Anderson stated that existing containers would become legal nonconforming uses.
    Public Comment:
    Edward Nielson stated he did not object and noted that the school district has some at Ashman.
    Tracy Balch stated that some containers are painted to resemble sheds and questioned how they differ from dilapidated homes or sheds.
    Councilmember Hansen said that enforcing aesthetics can be difficult but that clear standards are necessary.
    Hearing no further comment, the public hearing was closed at 7:30 p.m.
  23. Review and discuss the “R” project and consider moving forward with construction. Shawn Lloyd and Jaren Thomas spearheaded the project when they were students at Richfield High School. Lloyd said they recognized a need to improve upon the existing “R” and make it more visible. In their engineering class, they designed the “R” so that it would have a more visibility. The realization was that there were not many options for placement due to the available areas for placement of the “R”. The idea evolved into an upright Hollywood-style R, at the same scale as the sign in Hollywood.
    Jaren Thomas said they worked with Jones & DeMille in designing the project, which is aimed at providing a source of community pride. Richfield City also completed a land swap with the Utah State Institutional Trust Lands, which provides a space on the hills west of Richfield.
    Councilmember Thomas said this will be a painted sign that is painted in the red, white and blue colors. A lot of people have rallied behind the project.
    Trent McAllister is working on the fabrication of the sign. He stated that with the materials they are planning to use, it will be at least 30 years before maintenance even needs to be discussed. He also explained the design and the types of materials that will be used to build the structure. They are planning to have it outlined with led lights that can be changed to different colors for special events. They will be in small enough panels that if any of them are damaged they can be easily replaced. There is also a plan for a solar battery power system for it which will run the lights and the security cameras. InfoWest has donated internet for the project.
    Councilmember Arrington asked about people tagging it and damaging it that way. Mayor Burrows said a gate blocking the road to it should also be installed. McAllister said one of the advantages to the design is that each 4×8 panel can be removed and replaced.
    Jacoy Robinson and Chelsea Penny are volunteers who are heading the fund raising for this project. They want to make this happen for the community and the school. They have given donation packets to some businesses and the youth city council will take these around to 30 other businesses. The packets explain the different sponsorship levels and how the donors will be recognized. They are trying to take some of the burden off from the business community. They are scheduling a ceremony at the first football game of the year to recognize donors and light the “R”. There are also yard signs that they will be selling for $50, which will allow the community at large to donate to the project.
    Chelsea is in charge of fundraising. They are projecting that the total estimated cost would be $150,000, but with donations that are already committed of supplies and labor, they have this down to $65,000.
    They want the City’s approval to begin construction. They want the city to commit $20,000 in the next fiscal year’s budget as a contingency. They anticipate they will get the rest of the money needed, but they want the contingency just in case.
    Financial Director Jenson said he can put a line item in the budget for the 2026-27 fiscal year, but it would have to be approved by the council as part of that budget.
    Chelsea asked who will monitor the cameras, maintaining the lighting and other day to day operational.
    Councilmember Arrington said the City could consider a $5,000 donation with the $15,000 to ensure it is participating if the fundraising efforts are completely successful. Tanner Thompson offered $5,000 to the project if the City Council committed a $10,000 donation. Ben Robinson said he’d match that number.
    Councilmember Arrington asked if the City’s $10,000 would be tonight or in the next fiscal year. Mayor Burrows said he feels the City would be able to provide the $10,000 in July. He also has some steel that may be able to be used in the sign.
    Councilmember Thomas said there is already enough to start with the commitments on labor, materials and the cash donations received up to this point. If they can proceed now, they can meet the schedule. The bulk of the expense will be with the panels, the power coating and the lighting system.
    Councilmember Hansen said where the majority of the materials are metal, there is a chance the price could come down depending on the tariff situation.
    Motion: Approve the R project going forward and that the city is willing to commit $10,000 to the project in the upcoming year, Action: Approve, Moved by Kip Hansen, Seconded by Brayden Gardner. Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote (summary: Yes = 6).
    Yes: Andrew Chappell, Brayden Gardner, Kendrick Thomas, Kevin Arrington, Kip Hansen, New member.
  24. Consider approving the Winkel Annexation Resolution No. 2026-3.
    This is just accepting the formal annexation petition. Motion: Approve the Winkle Annexation resolution no. 2026-3, Action: Approve, Moved by Brayden Gardner, Seconded by Kevin Arrington. Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote (summary: Yes = 6).
    Yes: Andrew Chappell, Brayden Gardner, Kendrick Thomas, Kevin Arrington, Kip Hansen, New member.
  25. Consider approving a development agreement for Pioneer Townhomes. Councilmember Chappell felt that the attorney had addressed his concerns. Councilmember Hansen stated he felt the same.
    Councilmember Arrington said in the past when the City has gotten in trouble, it’s been with exceptions made to the code. He asked if there is something that could be changed in the code to reduce the need for development agreements.
    Mayor Burrows said the planning commission is looking at that. Deputy Clerk Anderson added that the planning commission is revamping what RM-11 is in the ordinance so that it can allow for townhomes with a zero setback on the sides without a development agreement. The setback approved under this agreement would take the setback from eight feet to zero feet on the shared sides. Another aim of the ordinance amendment that is being developed is to reduce confusion, as some feel that RM-11 means that 11 homes can be put on an acre lot no matter what, but some lots are simply not suited to that.
    Councilmember Chappell asked if part of the intent would be to make it easier to build townhomes. It would in that if they met the standards set in the code, the would not have to pursue a development agreement. There will likely need to be a work session with the City Council prior to it going to a public hearing.
    Mayor Burrows said he still has concerns for fire access in developments like this. He is also concerned as these are built as townhomes, but then if they are sold as one unit, they essentially become apartments. Had they been built as apartments, they would require a fire suppression system, where townhomes do not. That situation has happened in Richfield City, Deputy Clerk Anderson said. It is a gray area.
    Motion: Approve the development agreement for Pioneer Townhomes, Action: Approve, Moved by Kip Hansen, Seconded by Kendrick Thomas.
    Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote (summary: Yes = 6).
    Yes: Andrew Chappell, Brayden Gardner, Kendrick Thomas, Kevin Arrington, Kip Hansen.
  26. Consider approving the capital projects list for this year.
    Councilmember Thomas said there are requirements to have CASI [Capital Asset Self-Inventory] must be complete and the projects must be entered into the Utah Project portal.
    Councilmember Hansen said he is happy to see the bridge project on the list. The short-term list includes a fire truck, bridge replacement at 300 W and Highland Drive, underground water rights purchase and a 100 East property acquisition/road construction.
    The CIB will only see the top three projects. The 100 East project could be moved to the medium term, as it’s bridge won’t begin construction until late this year or perhaps the first part of next year.
    Motion: Approve the capital projects for this year, Action: Approve, Moved by Kendrick Thomas, Seconded by Kip Hansen.
    Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote (summary: Yes = 6).
    Yes: Andrew Chappell, Brayden Gardner, Kendrick Thomas, Kevin Arrington, Kip Hansen.
  27. OTHER BUSINESS.
    City Administrator Jolley asked if the council had received the information on the Utah Well Being project. They want to do a survey of the community to determine what the well being of the community is. They are asking for help in promotion, there is no cost to Richfield City. The information is provided to the City.
  28. ADJOURN. At 8:14 p.m., adjourn. Motion: Adjourn the meeting, Action: Adjourn, Moved by Kip Hansen, Seconded by Brayden Gardner.
    Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote (summary: Yes = 6).
    Yes: Andrew Chappell, Brayden Gardner, Kendrick Thomas, Kevin Arrington, Kip Hansen, New member.

PASSED and APPROVED this * day of * 2026.

                    ___________________________________
                            Recorder